slmt mencari ilmu anak2 sedaraku

Nurzawani @ ani, anak sedaraku yang sepatutnya ke UM Sabah

Nur amalina @ Ana, anak sedaraku paling 'besar' takat ini

mengikut jejak langkahku ke UIAM

course je lain-lain

sakinah, anak sedaraku yang paling sulung, beza usia kitorang, 6 tahun jerk!

bakal melanjutkan pelajaran ke Univerct of Melbourne, next February,

bakal doktor sakinah bersama bakal doktor nabihah, sesuai ker?

amin. berkat doa mama

bakal ahli biologi, Muazzamah, tahun 2 biologi UKM Bangi.

UKM tu dekat sgt dgn umah maksu yang lama.


minggu masuk U

minggu ni dan minggu depan, bebondong-bondonglah budak-budak baru dan lama masuk U. minggu ni untuk mereka yang mendaftar masuk buat pertama kalinya. dan minggu depan, untuk senior-senior yang baru abih cuti semester.

sepatutnya ani, anak sedaraku yang lahir di kota kolumpo dan juga yang membesar di kolumpo akan mendaftar masuk UMS [Universiti Malaysia Sabah]. aku bila dapat tau jerk, terus bantai gelak sampai sakit-sakit perut. nak tau sebabnya? anak sedaraku itu sejak lahir sampai abih sekolah menengah tak penah langsung berjauhan dari famili. anak mak lah katakan! tup tup dapat Sabah. hahaha dah lah course ntah apa-apa. hasil kaji selidik di UPU, ani ditawarkan kursus 'perhutanan' hahaha lagi laa aku gelak besar, ada orang 'utan' lah dalam famili kami pasni hahaha, nasiblah ani, maksu tolong gelak je. tapi maksu dengar cite ani nangis sehari semalam bila dapat tau kena merantau jauh, tambah buat lagi sadis bila dapat course yang tak penah terlintas di kepala otak maksu ni ha! ye ke nie? kesian lah plaknya maksu dengar. ntah camana ani oi boleh tersesat pi ke 'hutan' bukan ke masa sekolah ambik aliran sains, SPM pun gempak je resultnya. camna boleh tersasar jauh dari bidang sains ke bidang 'perhutanan' ish tak paham lah maksu dengan cara UPU sekarang ni. nasiblah masa maksu dulu, mintak course law dapat jugak course law, tak ke naya kalu maksu mintak law diorang bagi course kejururawatan hahaha.

last-last maksu dengar cite lagi dari sumber yang boleh dipercayai, ani tak nak p UMS plak dah, dia nak try mintak UNIKL dalam course medical science. kira ok lah tu dengan bidang yang dia minat. cuma bila join private ni, fees mesti mahal punya! maksu harap ani carilah sumber lain koreklah mana-mana biasiswa yang ada, PTPTN tu harap-harapnya last choice lah. tengok macam maksu ni, tak abih-abih bayor utang PTPTN, bila nak abih ntah? nasib baik gak, tu je lah utang maksu takat ni, utang kete, utang umah semua pada paksu. bijak tak maksu ni heheh

bagi anak sedaraku yang sorang lagi, ana namanya, yang akan melangkah ke main camp UIA Kuantan dalam bidang optometris, hah nanti ana jangan lupa check mata maksu ek! free yek! ana, tak boring ke belajo tentang mata orang ni? macam-macam mata ada , mata silau, mata rabun, buta mata, anak mata, mata keranjang pun ada oppss!, aku penah tanya ana nak kerja apa pas grad? dia kata pensyarah! dan dapat aku rasakan bahawa anak sedaraku akan jadi pensyarah mata! oh my god, tak dapat ku bayangkan! hehehe

selamatlah anak-anak sedaraku belajar, biar apapun ilmunya, ilmu yang kita ada hanya setitis dari ilmu Tuhan yang seluas lautan itu, belajor lah sungguh-sungguh sehingga tergenggamlah ijazah. teringat kata orang dulu-dulu, sebelum genggam anak sendiri genggam ijazah dulu, sebelum panjat tangga rumah, panjat tangga U dulu, ade kena mengena ke? ntahlaa.

p/s: rindunya zaman U dulu, seronok sangat-sangat. takde apapun masalah, cuma g-balik class and tutorial, then study untuk mid term dan final xm, pas xm tido, masa lapang tengok cd korea, hujung minggu baca novel cinta, malam-malam gayut tepon.... segalanya telah kutinggalkan. really miss everything! including my best fren ever : fidza, ayu n k.mazu, mis u all!

huwaaa sedihlah pulak!

seronoknya bertemu hari jumaat!

horrey! jumaat datang lagi, penghulu bagi hari-hari....

kenape aku terutamanya lah dan kawan2 lain suka sangat hari jumaat, ada 3 sebab utama :--)

• kes-kes aku hari jumaat semuanya telah diarrangekan hanya melibatkan permohonan yang simple-simple je, perlanjutan writ, penyampaian ganti, kebenaran memasukkan penghakiman, so tak lah lama sangat mendengar hujahan loyer-loyer. semuanya permohonan x-parte(satu pihak), takdelah loyer gaduh-gaduh depan aku... hari-hari lain, untuk permohonan inter-partes, perlu kehadiran peguam dua belah pihak, bila bicara, ambik masa lama untuk selesai, sampai gaduh-gaduh, tak laratlah nak layan and control...

• waktu lunch hour/rehat hari jumaat adalah yang paling panjang bermula jam 12.15 hingga 2.45 petang , selalunya kami yang pompuan-pompuan ni akan p shopping, bukan beli belahpun, sekadar cuci mata, tukar selera makan kat restoran yang agak bes (sebab hari-hari lain asyik makan kat court cafe je)...

• paling seronok sekali sebab hari jumaat adalah hari terakhir untuk bekerja, esok lusa cuti hujung minggu, sape yang tak suka cuti kan. banyak benda boleh dilakukan semasa cuti, antaranya menghabiskan masa melayan nabihah dan ayahnya, mengemas rumah, memasak, bersiar-siar dan balik kampung...minggu ni turn balik Perak. minggu depan turn Melaka, seronoknya...

selalunya bila masuk hari ahad, muka aku dah murung balik, huaaa esok (isnin) keje!.... dan aku akan ternanti-nantikan kehadiran hari jumaat berikutnya... begitulah rutin mingguanku, asyik mengharapkan kehadiran hari jumaat.

oklah jam 5 dah, siap sedia untuk balik rumah, ambik nabihah kat nursery!

kata hati- kerja! kerja! kerja!

kerja!kerja!kerja!

saat ini tatkala mata mulai celik di subuh hari, fikiranku hanya tertumpu kepada satu perkara, tak lain dan tak bukan, kerja. hari-hariku kini penuh kesibukan. tidak ada satu saatpun yang boleh menghilangkan perkataan kerja dari kotak ingatan ini waima di hari cuti...

hari-hariku kini terpaksa memyiapkan alasan penghakiman ketuaku yang satu itu. pening kepala ini untuk membaca fail-failnya yang ada, merangka nota dan mengambil segala fakta, membuat tapisan segala maklumat, menaip alasan yang kurasakan wajar, mencari kes-kes sokongan di dalam jurnal, dan akhir sekali mempersembahkan hasil kerjaku kepada bos yang sudah pasti akan meminda itu dan ini kerana tidak berpuas hati dengan hasil kerjaku. masakan berpuas hati, hasil kerjaku adalah selayaknya bagi aku yang bergred 41, dengan pengalaman yang tidak seberapa sedangkan dia telah berada di dalam servis selama lebih 20 tahun. tentunya hanya dia yang lebih arif menilai sesuatu kes berbanding aku.

hari-hariku dilalui bersama fail-fail mahkamah setiap hari, naik jemu, naik muak, naik mual aku meniliknya selalu. kalaulah boleh, aku tidak mahu memandang sedikitpun dengan fail-fail tersebut. namun apalah dayaku, inilah amanah dan tugasan wajib yang harus kupikul dengan penuh kesabaran dan kecekalan. inilah cabarannya selepas mengenggam ijazah undang-undang. kerjaku dikelilingi statut undang-undang, jurnal dan report undang-undang, selain fail-fail mahkamah. kalau 3 tahun dahulu mungkin aku teruja membaca tiap isi ilmu yang terangkum di dalam bidang undang-undang ini, tapi kini, aku menjadi jemu, pengisiannya sama sejak dulu. yang membezakan hanya fakta kes. tetapi undang-undang yang dirujuk tidak pernah berubah melainkan jika adanya pindaan terbaru.

3 tahun masa yang mencukupi untuk belajar dan berada di tempatku kini, Mahkamah Tinggi. aku rasakan sudah tiba saatnya aku beralih angin. tapi mahu ke mana? ketua jabatan telah bersetuju untuk membekukan perpindahan pegawai dalam tempoh 2 tahun ini kerana tempatku kini sedang dalam perubahan sistem pentadbiran. ketua jabatanku tidak mahu pegawai baru mengambil alih tempat pegawai yang telah lama berada di sini, atas alasan kami lebih arif dengan keadaan pentadbiran di mahkamah ini. adilkah? entahlah.

kerja! kerja! kerja! teruskanlah berkerja wahai mamanabihah. akan sampai saatnya apabila kerja tidak lagi mengejar dirimu, bila? pada saat izrail memanggilmu pulang....tapi sudah bersediakah dirimu untuk menemui Allah kerana ia juga bukan satu 'kerja' yang mudah!!

wallahualam

p/s: buat kerja! buat kerja! buat kerja!

puteri hati- riadah d TTwangsa

pohon beringin......mmm...mmm

.....lupa lirik daa....

main gelongsor dgn mama

hati mama berbisik: time aku kecik2 dulu, takde pulak benda2 ni.

lari! lari! ada serbuan......


nape tak goyang pun benda ni! nabihah tak berat laa

say cheesee

mama, time to go home!

kata hati

buat mereka yang sedang berjuang

jangan gentar tiap ancaman

jangan takut tiap ugutan

teruskanlah menegakkan kebenaran

biarpun sukar untuk menegakkan keadilan

sabarlah buat mereka yang sedang diuji

pastinya kesabaran akan membuahkan kejayaan abadi

walaupun tidak di dunia, di akhirat nanti, akan berbuah juga hasilnya

Berikut adalah komen dari retired Judge Court of Appeal berkaitan kes hangat yang menyentuh tentang krisis perlembagaan di Negeri Perak DR.

Do take the trouble to understand before you find fault with the judges of the Court of Appeal —Justice NH Chan is a retired judge of the Courts of Appeal.

MAY 26 — Before you go about judging the judges of the Court of Appeal on their five minute oral decision, which they handed down on Friday, May 22, 2009, please bear in mind the wise words of the most liberal of American judges, judge Learned Hand who once wrote — The Spirit of Liberty, p 110:… while it is proper that the people should find fault when the judges fail, it is only reasonable that they should recognise the difficulties … Let them be severely brought to book, when they go wrong, but by those who will take the trouble to understand.I shall now try to help you take the trouble to understand the oral findings of the Court of Appeal.

First of all we will look at what the New Straits Times, Saturday, May 23, 2009 has to say:PUTRAJAYA. … In allowing the appeal by Datuk Seri Zambry Abdul Kadir that he was constitutionally appointed as Mentri besar by the sultan on Feb 6, Court of Appeal judge Datuk Md Raus Sharif said there was no clear provision in the state Constitution that a vote of no confidence against Nizar must be taken in the assembly.Raus, who sat with Datuk Zainun Ali and Datuk Ahmad Maarop to hear submissions on Thursday, said Nizar had on February 4 made a request to the sultan to dissolve the assembly under Article 16 (6) because he no longer enjoyed the support of the majority assemblymen.He said Nizar had no choice but to resign once the ruler declined to dissolve the assembly.“There is no mandatory or express requirement in the Perak Constitution for a vote of no confidence to be taken in the legislative assembly,” Raus said in a five-minute oral ruling before a packed court room.That was all. That is the gravamen of the five minute decision.

What the Court of Appeal has said above as reported in the New Straits Times had also been said by Mr Justice Abdul Aziz in the High Court in his well considered judgment - 78 pages on A4 paper. This is what the High Court judge said, at p 30:It is not in dispute that His Royal Highness had exercised the royal prerogative in this case pursuant to Article XVI (2) (a) and (6) of the Perak State Constitution. However the applicant [Nizar] is not asking the Court to review His Royal Highness' prerogative to appoint the respondent [Zambry] as MB Perak or His Royal Highness’ prerogative to withhold consent to dissolve the State Legislative Assembly. The applicant concedes that the two royal prerogatives are not subject to review and non justiciable. That is the reason, the applicant [Nizar] said, His Royal Highness was not made a party to the present disputes.And at pp 36, 37 Abdul Aziz J also said:Under Article XVI(2) of the Perak’s State Constitution His Royal Highness shall appoint as Mentri Besar a member of the State Legislative Assembly who in His Royal Highness’ judgment is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the State Legislative Assembly. …I never had any doubt that the exercise of the royal prerogative to appoint a Mentri Besar pursuant to Article XVI(2) Perak’s State Constitution is solely based on personal judgment of His Royal Highness and that His Royal Highness may resort to any means in order to satisfy himself and accordingly to form his judgment as to whom who is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the State Legislative Assembly that he can be appointed as the Mentri Besar to lead the Executive Council.

I also have no doubt that His Royal Highness has absolute discretion with regard to the appointment of a Mentri Besar and the withholding of consent to a request for the dissolution of the State Legislative Assembly. This is plain and obvious from the reading of Article XVIII (1) and (2) (a) and (b) of Perak’s State Constitution. The High Court judge even agreed, at p 37:… that if the Mentri Besar ceases to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the State Legislative Assembly, he shall tender the resignation of the Executive Council,…So then, how could the Court of Appeal overrule the judgment of the High Court when the higher court substantially agrees with the judgment of the High Court? The newspaper report is not very clear on this point as we are still unaware of the reason for overruling the judgment of the High Court judge.

However, according to the report in the New Straits times, Raus JCA did say, “There is no mandatory or express requirement in the Perak Constitution for a vote of no confidence to be taken in the legislative assembly.”So what if there is no provision for a vote of no confidence in the Legislative Assembly? The High Court had found that Nizar is still the Mentri Besar. To overrule the decision of the High Court, the Court of Appeal must explain why the judge of the High Court was wrong in finding that Nizar is the Mentri Besar.The newspaper had even suggested that it could be implied in the ruling of the Court of Appeal that the Ruler had sacked the incumbent Mentri Besar Nizar:The unanimous Court of Appeal ruling yesterday seems to suggest that a head of state can sack the incumbent head of government once it was determined that the politician ceased to command the confidence of a majority of the elected representatives.The newspaper is wrong. That was not the finding of the Court of Appeal.

In any case the monarch has no power to dismiss a Mentri Besar — there is no provision for it in the Perak Constitution. The trial judge Abdul Aziz J in his judgment has explained why he found that Nizar is still the Mentri Besar. This is how he puts it — see p 54 of his judgment:It is true the request may be made only under two provisions of Perak’s State Constitution i.e. Article XVI(6) and Article XXXVI (1) and (2). But the circumstances under which the request can be made are unlimited. The request under Article XVI(6) is specific to a situation where the Mentri Besar ceases to command the confidence of the majority in the State Legislative Assembly; whereas under Article XXXVI (1) and (2), [the] situation is unlimited. It is up to the Mentri Besar to choose his time to make the request. However once a request is made under whichever of the two provisions, it is entirely up to His Royal Highness’ discretion whether to grant or [not to grant] the consent to dissolve the State Legislative Assembly.Then at pp 56-58 the High Court judge comes to this conclusion:In my view it is alright if His Highness takes upon himself to determine who commands the confidence of the majority in the State Legislative Assembly that he can appoint as the Mentri Besar. Such determination however is only good for the purpose of appointing a Mentri Besar pursuant to Article XVI(2)(a) Perak State Constitution. This is so because that provision speaks of ‘who in his judgment is likely to command the confidence of the majority’. The language used therein requires the exercise of a personal judgment on His Royal Highness.But the same thing cannot be said with regard to Article XVI(6) in deciding whether the Mentri Besar ceases to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the Legislative Assembly.

In this case His Royal Highness, through his enquiries has judged that the respondent [Zambry] has the support of the majority. But that finding does not necessarily mean His Royal Highness can form an opinion that the applicant [Nizar] ceases to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the legislative assembly.One reason for this is that the expression ‘in his judgment’ is not used in Article XVI(6). I am of the view that just because His Royal Highness had formed a judgment that the respondent [Zambry] is likely to command the confidence of the majority for the purpose of Article XVI(2)(a) to appoint the respondent [Zambry] as Mentri Besar it does not mean that His Royal Highness’ opinion or judgment is applicable in deciding that the applicant [Nizar] ceases to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the Legislative Assembly.In another word, one cannot say that because His Royal Highness has judged that the respondent [Zambry] is likely to command the confidence of the majority in the Legislative Assembly therefore the applicant [Nizar] ceases to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the Legislative Assembly.

I would say that the personal opinion or judgment of His Royal Highness is irrelevant to the construction of Article XVI(6).The [other] reason is that Article XVI(5) Perak State Constitution states that the Executive Council shall be collectively responsible to the Legislative Assembly. Under Article XVI(2)(a) the Mentri Besar is appointed to preside over the Executive Council. Article XVI(6) speaks of “If the Mentri Besar ceases to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the legislative Assembly …”. Reading these three provisions in Article XVI Perak State Constitution it is logical and in fact Article XVI(6) requires it to be so, that it is the Legislative Assembly that determines whether it has confidence in the Mentri Besar as the Head of the Executive Council. The Legislative Assembly may make the determination through a vote of no confidence against the Mentri Besar. (The emphasis is mine)It seems to us ordinary folk that the Court of Appeal has missed the point. They decided that Zambry was properly appointed Mentri Besar under Article XVI(6). That is not correct — he could only be appointed under Article XVI(2)(a). Since there cannot be two Mentri Besar and Nizar the incumbent Mentri Besar has not resigned and, further, since the legislative assembly did not decide if he has ceased to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the assembly, Nizar, unquestionably, is still the Mentri Besar of Perak.Nizar’s case was that Article XVI(6) speaks of “If the Mentri Besar ceases to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the Legislative Assembly”.

The poser is who is to decide “If the Mentri Besar ceases to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the Legislative Assembly” under Article XVI(6)? Certainly not the Ruler because the phrase “in his judgment” — which is used in Article XVI(2)(a) — is not used in Article XVI(6). If it is not to be the Ruler then who is to decide “If the Mentri Besar ceases to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the Legislative Assembly”?The answer is in Article XVI(6) itself — only the Legislative Assembly itself could decide if the Mentri Besar ceases to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the Assembly. Article XVI(6) clearly states that the Mentri Besar who no longer commands the confidence of the majority of the Legislative Assembly “shall tender the resignation of the Executive Council”. This has to be done “unless at his [the Mentri Besar's] request His Royal Highness dissolves the Legislative Assembly”. But Mentri Besar Nizar could not admit that he ceases to command the confidence of the majority of the members of the Legislative Assembly because he would not know until a vote has been taken at the Assembly to determine so. Only the Assembly itself would know if a vote is taken to determine whether the Mentri Besar has lost the confidence of the majority of the members of the Assembly.Now that you have understood the five-minute decision of the Court of Appeal as well as the well considered judgment of the trial judge, you should be able to severely bring to book the judges of this Court of Appeal since you are now aware if they have done wrong.

Before I sign off, I wish to say a few nice words to the High Court judge. Mr Justice Abul Aziz Abdul Rahim is a fantastic judge. The judgment, especially the piece on the interpretation of Article XVI(6), is so good that it has persuaded me to change my mind on my view of Article XVI(6). If you remember my first article, I have expressed an opinion on Article XVI(6). Now I know I was wrong — and I have to thank Abdul Aziz J for showing me the way.

p/s: moga-moga akan ada secebis keadilan di akhir zaman ini, amin.

puteri hati

mama, mainan kat sana macam bes je!

lenanya tido baby mama dgn gajahnya

nabihah senyum! nak masuk blog ni


mama! ayah! jgn tinggal nabihah

nabihah dan ayah


izzah nabihah yang solehah

hobi nabihah, kemas rumah!

bakul baju mama ni sepah-sepah laa

nabihah tak tahu nak letak mana

nabihah! hampir setahun usiamu sayang, kehadiranmu melengkapi hidup mama dan ayah, menceriakan dan amat membahagiakan, masih segar di ingatan ini, saat mengandungkan dirimu, pelbagai dugaan datang menguji, saat melahirkanmu pada 06-07-08 lalu, saat pertama kali membelai kulit mulusmu, saat pertama kali mendengar tangisanmu, saat pertama kali menyusuimu, terasa cepar benar masa berlalu. kini, anak mama kian dewasa, mula belajar dan suka bermain. doa mama, semoga izzah nabihah menjadi hamba yang taat padaNya, umat Muhammad yang cemerlang, juga anak yang solehah dunia akhirat, amin!

kata hati

Sesekali aku mengelamun jauh, mengenang kembali saatnya kami bertemu, kira-kira 10 tahun lalu, di bumi Matrikulasi UIAM PJ, kami mengikuti kursus yang sama-undang2, juga ada kalanya belajar di kelas yang sama, tetapi saat itu, kami hanya melihat dari jauh, langsung tidak bertegur sapa, tidak berkawan mesra.

Semester akhir di PJ, kami mula bertukar nota dan berdiskusi, saling berbual dan bertukar cerita, lantas terjalinlah ikatan persahabatan. melangkah ke UIA Gombak, persahabatan kian erat, biarpun ada dugaan datang melanda, dapat kami harungi bersama, 5 tahun di bawah bumbung fakulti Ahmad Ibrahim, banyak asam garam pahit manis ditempuh bersama, ada kalanya menguji rasa, mencabar jiwa, namun, andai telah ditetapkan rezeki dan jodoh, kami masih kekal bersama.

Sebaik melangkah ke alam pekerjaan, kami berusaha mengumpul wang untuk kenduri, kami tidak menunggu lama untuk melangsungkan pernikahan, 3 bulan bertunang, sebelum berkahwin pada akhir 2006, demi menghalalkan satu hubungan dan menyatukan dua keluarga. bersama-sama memulakan langkah melayari bahtera rumah tangga.

Kini, setelah hampir 3 tahun usia perkahwinan, dan genap 10 tahun tempoh perkenalan, banyak yang aku masih belum tahu tentang dirinya, makin lama kita bersama, makin banyak yang perlu aku teroka, makin banyak yang perlu aku teroka, makin banyak rahsianya yang belum aku jumpa. aku tahu aku bukanlah pasangan yang hebat buatnya, kerana aku juga insan biasa yang tak punya apa, insan yang sentiasa berbuat dosa, insan kerdil yang masih belajar mengenali dirinya, tuhanku kuatkan ah aku dalam mengharungi dunia rumahtangga ini, supaya aku bisa membahagiakannya di dunia jua di sana.

p/s : aku cuba menjadi seperti Siti Hawa, Siti Hajar, Siti Khadijah, tetapi masih kurang iman dan ilmu untuk menjadi seperti mereka